| Key indicators |
Indicator compliance |
% compliance |
|
|
1 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
17 |
| ■ <0.5 × water quality objective |
| ■ 0.5-1.0 × water quality objective |
| ■ 1.0-1.5 × water quality objective |
| ■ ≥1.5 × water quality objective |
|
The Tingalpa estuary continued to receive a “C”
grading for the 2009 Report Card. EHI water quality indicators for this
system were similar to previous years with the largest change being
increased turbidity. The system had only 19% compliance with QWQ
objectives for turbidity in 2008/2009 compared with 42% in 2007/2008.
Turbidity is highest about 6-9km upstream in the middle-upper reaches
of the estuary, approximately at the end of the influence of the tidal
cycle and likely results from resuspension of sediments due to
hydrological forces, although catchment sourced sediments may have
contributed during this reporting period because of heavy rainfall
events. As previously, the estuary rarely met QWQ guidelines for
nutrient concentrations with 17% compliance for median TN and only 1%
compliance for median TP (compared to 19% and 0% for 2008/2009,
respectively). However, although still high, median TP concentrations
in 2008/2009 were some of the lowest recorded in this estuary since the
EHMP began (1999).
Overall, 93% of the Tingalpa estuary contains
unmodified riparian habitat with nearly 100% of the intertidal zone
unmodified. Only the upper reaches of the estuary in the background
behind the intertidal zone is the habitat highly modified for
residential and commercial developments. The large component of natural
riparian habitat remaining in Tingalpa estuary (the most for any estuary
monitored within the EHMP), helps enhance the BHR for the system and
support its Report Card grade.
Abbreviations glossary |
Indicators and methods
|