Pimpama Estuary

Overview

Key indicators Indicator compliance % compliance
60
47
49
16
0
<0.5 × water quality objective
0.5-1.0 × water quality objective
1.0-1.5 × water quality objective
≥1.5 × water quality objective

The Pimpama estuary received a “C” in the 2009 Report Card, a deterioration in ecosystem health from the previous year (“C+”). This slight reduction in grade was due mainly to an increase in phytoplankton abundance (49% compliance compared with 84% in 2007/2008) and deterioration in turbidity levels (47% compliance compared to 60% in 2007/2008).  Despite a drop in report card grade, there were slight improvements in dissolved oxygen concentrations in the upper reaches and the BHR also improved slightly with sewage nitrogen levels (δ15N) slightly reduced from the previous reporting period.  TN concentrations did not comply with QWQ guidelines throughout the year (previously 9% compliance in 2007/2008).

Water quality patterns in the estuary are strongly partitioned and influenced by the weir which restricts tidal flushing of the upper estuary.  As a result, water quality is poor in the upper reaches and is characterised by high nutrient and low DO concentrations.

Overall, 68% of the riparian habitat of the Pimpama estuary is unmodified with the majority of that found in the reaches beneath the weir where the system passes through conservation area and National Park.  Much of the habitat in the reaches above the weir and behind the intertidal zone has been removed for agricultural purposes.

Abbreviations glossary | Indicators and methods

EHI Justification

EHI Scores (70%) BHR (30%) Combined Score
No RAP (15%) RAP (15%)
0.35 0.75 0.68 0.46
Previous EHI Scores
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
0.64 0.70 0.75 0.78 0.47 0.45

ECOSYSTEM HEALTH INDEX (EHI)

The EHI is a measure of the proportion of a reporting zone that complied with the water quality objectives for key indicators monitored as part of the Ecosystem Health Monitoring Program. The water quality objectives are defined in the South East Queensland Regional Water Quality Management Strategy (2001).

  • EHI 1 = 100% of area complies with the environmental objectives.
  • EHI 0 = 0% of the area complies with the environmental objectives.

BIOLOGICAL HEALTH RATING (BHR)

The Partnership's Scientific Expert Panel has endorsed a change to the BHR in 2006-07 which increase the BHR from 20% to 30% of the Report Card Grade.

The reason for the change is the implementation of the Riparian Assessment Program (RAP) which will comprise 15% of the total grade (half of the BHR). The other BHR indicators will make up the last 15%

Estuary Cutoffs RC Grade
<0.25 F
>0.25 <0.36 D
>0.36 <0.55 C
>0.55 <0.90 B
>0.90 A

The data from the riparian assessment is available as PDF document.

Graphs

Temporal Plot

Map

Site Number Waterway
Site Description
1801 Pimpama
Pimpama River 3.6km downstream from mouth
1802 Pimpama
Pimpama River 1.8km downstream from mouth
1803 Pimpama
Pimpama River 0.0km at mouth
1804 Pimpama
Pimpama River 2.2km from mouth
1805 Pimpama
Pimpama River 5.4km from mouth
1806 Pimpama
Pimpama River 8.3km from mouth at Pimpama Norwell Rd Bridge
1807 Pimpama
Pimpama River 9.6km from mouth - Jacobs Well Rd
1808 Pimpama
Pimpama River 13.9km from mouth