|
The Brisbane estuary received a “D+” in the 2008
Report Card but in 2009 this dropped to a “D”. This small reduction in
grade was due to a combination of factors with the major ones being a
decrease in compliance for turbidity (7% in 2008/2009 compared to 14% in
2008/2007) and a reduction in BHR in relation to sewage nitrogen (δ15N).
The Brisbane River estuary continued to be
non-compliant for TP and only 6% compliant for TN. DO compliance also
continued to be low (30% compared with 34% the previous year). Relative
to other indicators, Chl-a continued to be
mostly within QWQ objectives (88% compared to 86% the previous year) but
this is likely because the low water clarity associated with high
turbidity often limited phytoplankton growth.
The poorest water quality in the Brisbane
estuary was found in the middle to upstream reaches with the nutrient
and turbidity concentrations peaking around 50 – 70km from the mouth
near Goodna, Wacol and Moggill. There are three WWTPs and numerous
small creeks that deliver both nutrients and sediments to these reaches
and water quality is further compounded by the long residence times
(poor flushing) in the same reaches. Additionally, this part of the
middle-to-upper estuary is where the low salinity zone (< 10 psu)
occurs and flocculation of suspended sediments further exacerbates
turbidity. However, median TP concentrations throughout all except the
upper reaches of the Brisbane estuary were the lowest recorded since the
inception of the EHMP, likely because of upgrades to WWTP including the
recent operation of 3 Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plants (AWTP).
Overall, 32% of the total Brisbane estuary
contains unmodified riparian habitat with most of that found in the
intertidal zones upstream of the city reaches.
Abbreviations glossary |
Indicators and methods
|