Deception Bay

Overview

Key indicators Indicator compliance % compliance
75
0
54
54
NA 37
<0.5 × water quality objective
0.5-1.0 × water quality objective
1.0-1.5 × water quality objective
≥1.5 × water quality objective

Deception Bay received a “D-” in the 2009 Report Card, a small drop in ecosystem health from the previous year (“D”).  This was largely due to an increase in abundance of the toxic cyanobacteria Lyngbya majuscula on the shallow bank off Godwin’s Beach and a decrease in compliance for nutrients (TN), especially in the shallow south-western parts of the bay near the mouth of the Caboolture River. The Lyngbya bloom in 2008/09 was more extensive and of greater density than in the previous year.

In 2008/2009, phytoplankton concentrations (Chl-a) were not compliant with QWQ objectives, but based on previous EHMP monitoring this result was not unexpected. Phytoplankton biomass in Deception Bay peaks over the summer months when strong north- or south-easterly winds occur that cause the resuspension of the sediments in the shallow waters which releases nutrients into the water column.  Nutrients also enter the bay from the Caboolture estuary with the higher TN and Chl-a concentrations generally found near the mouth of this system.

As in previous years, the sewage nitrogen indicator (δ15N) was below guideline limits (i.e. fully compliant) throughout the bay with values slightly higher at the sites adjacent to the Caboolture River mouth. This is typical of the general nutrient patterns in the bay due to the discharge from the river and higher residence times for waters in the south-west corner of the system.  The northern part of the bay in comparison has better water quality and is flushed with cleaner oceanic water from the north passage between Bribie and Moreton Islands.  Meadows of the seagrass Zostera muelleri grow in this northern zone of Deception Bay but there has been a considerable reduction in the depth range to which they occur since the previous reporting period (impacting on the BHR for the system).

Abbreviations glossary | Indicators and methods

EHI Justification

EHI (80%) BHR (20%) Combined Score
0.46 0.50 0.47
Previous EHI Scores
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
0.81 0.83 0.62 0.70 0.95 0.59

ECOSYSTEM HEALTH INDEX (EHI)

The EHI is a measure of the proportion of a reporting zone that complied with the water quality objectives for key indicators monitored as part of the Ecosystem Health Monitoring Program. The water quality objectives are defined in the South East Queensland Regional Water Quality Management Strategy (2001).

  • EHI 1 = 100% of area complies with the environmental objectives.
  • EHI 0 = 0% of the area complies with the environmental objectives.

BIOLOGICAL HEALTH RATING (BHR)

The BHR forms 20% of the the Report Card Grade. The values in this sheets are calculated using the original method used since 2002-03 and is presented for comparison.

Bay Cutoffs RC Grade
<0.5 F
>0.5 <0.7 D
>0.7 <0.8 C
>0.8 <0.9 B
>0.9 A

Graphs

Temporal Plot Spatial Plot

Map

Site Number Bay Area
Site Description
1100 Deception Bay
1101 Deception Bay
1102 Deception Bay
1106 Deception Bay
1107 Deception Bay
1111 Deception Bay
1118 Deception Bay
1119 Deception Bay
1122 Deception Bay